Is Trump Preparing For Retaliation After USS Fitzgerald “Collision” Ruled “Act Of War”


It is rumored that U.S. retaliation is likely to soon occur throughout the entire Sea of Japan region, in response to North Korea hacking the autopilot controls of a massive container ship, then crashing it into a US Navy destroyer killing, at least, 7 American sailors. Questions have arisen on an international scale as to what exactly took place. Was this a false flag, an accident, or did something more sinister take place?  Did it even take place?  Is the following information true and accurate? Is the deep state involved? Whatever it is, it is unfolding.
According to reliable sources, on June 17, 2017, the US Navy destroyer DDG-62 USS Fitzgerald collided with MV ACX Crystal, a Philippine-flagged container ship, 104 kilometers (64 miles) southwest of Yokosuka and 19 kilometers (12 miles) southeast of the city of Shimoda—both cities being in Japan.
MoD analysis of sea and weather conditions existing in the collision area at the time this incident occurred, shows the waters having a very favorable rating for travel.

With neither sea or weather conditions having any contributing factor in this collision, MoD analysts t began an Automated Identification System (AIS) analysis of both the USS Fitzgerald and ACX Crystal—with it being quickly discovered that the USS Fitzgerald was operating without their AIS, but the ACX Crystal being able to have its entire course analyzed.
AIS, is a tracking system that has become the “Internet of Ships” and is a tool for nearly anyone to identify and track ships traveling around the world through websites and mobile applications—with many AIS receivers connected directly to the Internet via serial port servers that are carried aboard ships, buoys, and other navigation markers.
The MoD’s analysis of the ACX Crystal’s AIS tracking data, showed that the cause of this collision was due to it radically altering its course by making a “U turn” on the open sea and then heading directly towards the USS Fitzgerald and ramming it.

Audio recordings coming from the USS Fitzgerald US Navy sailors feverishly tried to avoid the ACX Crystal, but to no avail as this 10-story tall container ship had greatly accelerated its speed—with no one on the USS Fitzgerald being able to fully comprehend that they were under attack.
It was reported that two days before the ACX Crystal rammed the USS Fitzgerald, ( June 15th) the same type of “incident” occurred when a Federation registered yacht named the Katalexa, that was sailing from Taiwan to the Russian city of Vladivostok, was hijacked by North Korea with its frantic crew desperately radioing that they had lost “all control” over their vessel.

MoD and SVR “assests”, quickly secured the release of the Katalexa from North Korea—with the SVR reporting that an examination of its onboard electronic systems showed that its autopilot had been hacked and was the cause of it’s being “steered” into North Korean waters in the Sea of Japan. More here.
Important to note, sources report that the Katalexa was equipped with a NAVIPILOT 4000 Marine Autopilot system that receives its orders from the Northrop Grumman Sperry Marine ECDIS, and that ACX Crystal was equipped with a more sophisticated version of called the Northrop Grumman Sperry Marine VisionMaster FT Integrated Bridge System (IBS), both being manufactured by the British based company Sperry Marine Northrop Grumman.
Both the Katalexa and ACX Crystal events occurred during the night hours when everyone was asleep.

While some American sources are claiming that the Chinese hijacked the autopilot of the ACX Crystal in order to ram it into the USS Fitzgerald, MoD analysts, instead, attribute this “act of war” to Unit 180 of North Korea’s Reconnaissance General Bureau (RGB)—who just this past month, terrified the world with its WannaCry “ransomware” cyber attack that infected more than 300,000 computers in 150 countries, and is linked to last year’s $81 million cyber heist at the Bangladesh central bank and the 2014 attack on Sony’s Hollywood studio too. So what is taking place? Is deep state involved?

US aircraft carrier battle groups CVN-68 Nimitz, CVN-70 Carl Vinson and CVN-76 Ronald Reagan have rapidly been redeployed to the Sea of Japan, to perform a so called massive US military war exercise. A reminder to North Korea of the US’s commitment to retaliation against North Korean aggression as in the war exercise called “Northern Edge” conducted last year in Alaska with America’s entire integrated force structure involved to know what will happen—and one of whose participants, Mr. Rickey Smith, US Deputy Chief of Staff, G-9,Training and Doctrine Command, detailed exactly how to take care of North Korea’s hacking by his stating: “If you want to stop a cyber-attack, put a 120mm tank round through the server and the operator of the cyber attack will stop”.

Between this incident, along with the continuation of missile testing, and the death of the 22 year old U.S. student Otto Warmbier just released from North Korean prison on June 13th , arriving home in a coma and pronounced dead on June 19, 2017. It does appear something is brewing.




While little has been said about Trump’s new pick to head the Federal Bureau of Investigation (F.B.I.) due to Fake News shouting “Russia”, the Republican baseball shooting leaving Scalise in critical condition,  and the Dems pouring mega millions into congressional races only to lose… meet Christopher Wray,  Partner, King & Spalding.
Trump had been looking at several candidates but never let anyone know who he picked as his nominee. They found out when he tweeted.  Even Senator Grassley (R) Iowa and chairman of the Judiciary Committee said, “I learned about it from Twitter.  But then, I learn a lot of things about the president from Twitter.”


Wray’s law firm, King & Spalding, is an American law firm with 129 years of service, founded in Atlanta, Georgia in 1885 by Alexander C. King and Jack Spalding. Today, the firm holds offices in Austin, Charlotte, Houston, New York, San Francisco, Silicon Valley, and Washington, D.C. The firm has a London-based international arm, King & Spalding International LLP, which opened in 2003, and office or affiliates in Abu Dhabi, Dubai, Frankfurt, Geneva, Moscow, Paris, Riyadh, Singapore and Tokyo.
In 2002 and 2003, Corporate Board Member magazine named King & Spalding Atlanta’s best corporate law firm, and in 2008, ranked the company among the top 20 law firms in the United States preferred by corporate general counsel to represent their companies on national matters.


Christopher Wray played a pivotal role in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, providing oversight of Justice Department operations.  As head of the criminal division from 2003 to 2005, Mr. Wray directed efforts to deal with fraud scandals plaguing the corporate world.  He is a well seasoned and highly regarded criminal lawyer and represented Mr. Christie in the aftermath of the scandal over traffic jams that rocked his governorship.


“I know that he will again serve his country as a fierce guardian of the law and model of integrity once the Senate confirms him to lead the F.B.I.,”  stated President Trump in a statement.
Hopefully, Christopher Wray will get senate approval quickly.



Are you tired of hearing fake news complain about President Trump telling his truths on twitter and social media?  Are you tired of their threats to demand Twitter to ban President Trump from tweeting?  I sure am.

The media is so dishonest, our only communication to what Trump really says and does is through his transparency via social media and his rally’s.  The man can not burp without fake news making some exploited event out of it.  If he did burp, they would spend hours debating what he ate and how fast he ate it, or spin the burp into some sort of deadly gastrointestinal disorder and throw lots for his Presidential seat.  Intellectualizing and morphing it into whether or not V.P. Pence was up for the job and who he would pick as his V.P.!

The news is owned by the establishment elite who have their boney hands all over their agenda to control the world and President Trump is ruining a lot of systems they have spent billions of dollars to put into place.  They hate it because he has access to over a hundred million people which is more access than all the fake news stations combined!

And that’s not counting President Trump’s closet followers.  Those who watch all but are afraid to say it out loud.

So tweet and retweet Mr. President!   Tweet all day and night to let me and others know what is taking place and what we can do to help drain the swamp!

He’s my president! TWEET AWAY!




President Trump has blocked a lot of people on Twitter. And now, some are arguing that’s a violation of their First Amendment rights. GOOD GRIEF! I am sure there was good reason and just cause.  I’ve read some of the scathing “F” bomb garbles and Baron bashing, Melania hating anti-Trump death trash he gets.

It’s called abuse. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzabuse1

The above Twitter Abuse Report (that is always reviewed by authorized officials) means President Trump or anybody that doesn’t want to be a cyber friend of someone, or put up with their irritating and/or irrational thought processes,  has the right to remove them from their site.  How is that a violation of a persons’ first amendment rights? It sounds more like the person(s) removed have abused the privilege to be on the page and was removed to keep the group members protected from the offensive misconduct.


The insanity stops here!


IT’S TIME WE ALL REMEMBER WHAT THE FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT IS AND WHAT IT ISN’T.  FAKE NEWS ALONG WITH MEMBERS OF CONGRESS AND THE SENATE HAVE BECOME SO ABUSIVE THEY HAVE ALL CROSSED THE LINE INTO SHEER LAWLESSNESS LIKE WILD HEATHEN! The groups they encourage to commit violence on the streets has gone to far. It is no longer about exercising first amendment rights when it is abusive misconduct that harms others or prohibits them from conducting their normal  or planned activity, incites fear or terror.    The displays coming from public spokespersons, entertainers, political commentators, newscasters, and elected government officials is downright appalling and treasonous.  To encourage incitement to harm and riot is an accomplice of the act.  Those who helped to incite or encourage a crime, funded the crime, or knew about the crime before hand,  should be charged as an accomplice to it,  and if it is a crime ending in death, the same aforementioned should be charged with second degree murder.  Just like it is written in the law.

Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

First Amendment rights are limited when a direct threat is posed either to an individual or to a group. It is a topic of controversy, since it is often difficult to tell what is a direct threat and what is simply a statement of opinion. First Amendment rights are limited when a direct threat is posed either to an individual or to a group, therefore, it is time to press charges against any and all who pose direct threats.

The following factual information is from Legal Information Institute


A. “Fighting Words”
1. Free speech does not apply to “fighting words.” These are words which by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace.
2. “Fighting words” fall outside First Amendment protection because they:

a .Form no essential part of any exposition of ideas; and
b. Are of such slight social value that society’s interest in order and morality outweighs any benefit derived from them.

B. Defamation
1. Public Officers
First Amendment protection extends to defamation of a public officer’s official conduct, since such conduct is a matter of public concern. It does not apply, however, to defamation made with actual malice, i.e., with knowledge of falsehood or with reckless disregard of whether or not a statement is false.

2. Public Figures
a .Erroneous statements about public figures receive First Amendment immunity, even if such statements intentionally inflict emotional distress. Immunity does not apply to defamation made with actual malice. Even without actual malice, however, publishers may be liable for defaming public figures when:

i. The substance of the defamation risks substantial danger to reputation; and
ii. The publisher engages in highly unreasonable conduct departing in the extreme from professional standards.

b. The media are not protected by rights of free speech and press for obtaining news information through such misconduct as tortious or criminal activity. This is particularly true where the information is of minimal value to the public.

3. Private Figures
The First Amendment does not shield the media from liability for defamation of private figures.

a. Private persons lack public figures’ access to the media to counteract false statements. Private individuals’ greater vulnerability to injury and states’ interest in protecting such people justify media liability.
b. People drawn into the public forum largely against their will are not public figures. Therefore, a publisher may be held liable, without proof of actual malice, for defaming a private person regarding a matter that is of purely private concern.

4. Group Libel
Libel is not within the area of speech protected by the First Amendment. Since libel aimed at individuals may be punished, government may proscribe libel directed at groups. Restrictions on libelous expression must not be willful, purposeless, or unrelated to maintaining peace and well-being.

C. Invasion of Privacy
1. Public Record/Public Concern
Freedom of speech and press renders the media immune from liability for invasion of a non-public figure’s privacy where the disseminated information is:
a. Truthful;
b. Of legitimate public concern; and
c. Derived from publicly available records, such as official court documents.
Government may constitutionally punish such dissemination only when the punishment is narrowly tailored to a state interest of the highest order.



The Supreme Court requires the government to provide substantial justification for the interference with the right of free speech where it attempts to regulate the content of the speech. Generally, a person cannot be held liable, either criminally or civilly for anything written or spoken about a person or topic, so long as it is truthful or based on an honest opinion, and such statements.

The Supreme Court has also recognized that the government may prohibit some speech that may cause a breach of the peace or cause violence. The level of protection speech receives also depends on the forum in which it takes place.

Freedom of the press guaranteed by the First Amendment is not very different from the right to freedom of speech. It allows an individual to express themselves through publication and dissemination. It is part of the constitutional protection of freedom of expression. It does not afford members of the media any special rights or privileges not afforded to citizens in general.

Right to Assemble / Right to Petition
The right to assemble allows people to gather for peaceful and lawful purposes. Implicit within this right is the right to association and belief.

This implicit right is limited to the right to associate for First Amendment purposes. It does not include a right of social association. The government may prohibit people from knowingly associating in groups that engage and promote illegal activities. The right to associate also prohibits the government from requiring a group to register or disclose its members or from denying government benefits on the basis of an individual’s current or past membership in a particular group. There are exceptions to this rule where the Court finds that governmental interests in disclosure/registration outweigh interference with First Amendment rights. The government may also, generally, not compel individuals to express themselves, hold certain beliefs, or belong to particular associations or groups.

Unlawful Assembly

Definition from Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary
When three or more people meet with the intention of carrying out an unlawful act to deliberately disturb the peace.

Riot – Definition
A concerted action: (1) made in furtherance of an express common purpose; (2) through the use or threat of violence, disorder, or terror to the public; and (3) resulting in a disturbance of the peace. Under common law, the crime of riot requires the assemblage of three or more actors. The concerted acts may be unlawful in themselves, or they may be lawful acts that are done in a violent or turbulent manner. Among the different forms that riots may take include escalated labor disputes or political demonstrations. While most riots occur in public places, they may also take place within prisons


All Americans have first amendment rights and laws are in place to insure and to protect those rights.  Those who abuse those rights are applicable to punishment by law and not by twisted interpretations of self perceived radical perversions of the true instruction and intent of aforesaid stated first amendment right.


And by the way, Twitter is an equal opportunity organization that allows all of its’ users the right to block unwanted visitors.






Young Russian Offered $15 Million And US Citizenship In “Deep State” Plot Against Trump…

“According to the testimonial letter of Yevgeniy Nikulin —shortly after President Trump was elected, Director Comey’s FBI agents (on 14-15 November 2016, and 7 February 2017) made this extraordinary illegal offer with his affirming under oath: “…I received a proposal from A [gent]: You will have to declare that you have broken Hillary Clinton’s mailbox for Donald Trump on the orders of Vladimir Putin, you must agree to extradition to the United States, here we will remove all the charges we will give you apartment and money, American citizenship—I refused, soon the interrogation was over, the Agent said that they would still come”. [PYC]  Read full article here


Is anyone else starting to wonder at how this swamp works?  Wonder how they sleep at night?  We know Comey can’t.  He used to have no problem….until President Trump. I say good.  The question is, how many times have they done things like this?  Do we really want to know?  Could we handle the answer?  Makes you want to go fishing, or hunting for something, doesn’t it?




With the US mainstream propaganda “fake news” media attacking President Trump for supposedly jeopardizing a critical source of intelligence relating to Islamic terrorists by his revealing classified information to Russia, this report explains, the absurdity of this spurious charge is, actually, laughable as it’s impossible for any American president to break any of his nations laws relating to classified material as they, and them alone, are the final deciders of what is secret or not—thus leading the Kremlin to state: “this is not a topic for us, it’s just another nonsense…we do not want to have anything to do with this nonsense at all…this is complete nonsense, there is no topic here either for confirmation or for refutation”. Read FULL STORY HERE!!

Lame attempts to create mob action via witch hunts brought about by a fake media controlled by the deep state cabal have all but failed.  These tactics, designed by  communist  Maurice Strong and  fine tuned by hand selected cabal puppets in order to mind control humanity  to bring about the new world order for evil men.  This is not a free press, it is a mockery of the first amendment.  A free press is not handed scripts and told what to say and/or given a list of what they can and can not talk about in the news.  It is a dictator style agenda 21 mind control fascist propaganda machine, well oiled and fine tuned and  shamefully treasonous.


All such propaganda styled apparatus’s should not be allowed to have air time that freely flows into peoples homes.  It should be peddled on the streets like other communist take over America leaflet trash.  It has no more standing than a Black Panther’s leaflet handed out on a major cities corner, printed in secret at an unknown warehouse building. It is not the manner of filth that should ever be allowed to be aired freely to unaware citizens.

All to bring down a seated president whose focus was on the Constitution, Bill of Rights, restoring law and order, and making America great again. Why?  Because the seated President Trump wanted no part in destroying America and handing her over to a tyrannical world rationing system known as the New World Order.

How did it get this far?  The United Nations and its’ Sustainable Development Program for the 21st Century, New World Order, was pushed and encouraged by past presidents (especially George H. Bush) since its’ inception after world war II.   It was President Bill Clinton that sold Americans down the river by signing its’ agreement to participate in its’ evil charter to destroy nation sovereignty, share the wealth, depopulate the earth and usher in world tyranny governed by appointed elites.


President Trump is at war with the oligarchs.  He has already undone a few of their supporting pillars like the TTP, Paris Climate Agreement, BLM, and Obama Care, along with a lot of their bricks like common core, and illegal immigration, sanctuary cities, drug running – just to name a few.  In short, he is not for making America a part of a world order of chaos, where all citizens have the same amount of rations and do what they are told to do or are culled from the herd.

God be with us all as we go forth to restore law and order to a nation in distress.




While fake news was (and still is) consumed with “Russia Russia” allegations against President Trump, he was busy preparing for a mass Swamp Drain.  On May 13, 2017 President Trump ordered a US Federal Prison to Prepare For 23 “High Security Political Defendants”, one believed to be Hillary Clinton.

Prime Minister Hasina testified to the FBI and the US Justice Department that in 2011 then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called her office demanding that Muhammad Yunus be restored to his role as chairman of the Bangladesh’s most famous microcredit bank, Grameen Bank; yet the bank had paid between $100,000 and $250,000 to the Clinton Global Initiative, with Yunus himself personally giving the Clinton Foundation between $25,000 and $50,000.

Grameen Bank was created by Muhammad Yunus and said to be a pioneer in the concepts of microcredit and microfinance to help poor peoples—but, pay to Hillary Clinton of nearly $500,000 led the SVR (among others) to question its true motives. Charges of embezzlement and loan-sharking have yet to be fully investigated.

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzUntitled-1 copy

As part of the Bangladesh government, Prime Minister Hasina further told the FBI and US Justice Department that under her nations banking laws, no one could be the director of Grameen Bank past the age of 60—and that by his management of this bank, until she dismissed him upon taking power, Yunus, at age 70, in effect, had stolen 10-years of salary and benefits too.  Read Full Story Here

Excerpts from the article in the link above: “US Federal Prison Ordered By Trump To Prepare For 23 “High Security Political Defendants” 

” Most shocking about this newly discovered crime by Hillary Clinton, this report notes, is that the FBI had known about it—but after Director Comey had ordered the investigation to cease, and barely a fortnight prior to President Trump taking office, “someone” at the FBI mysteriously posted on its website over 300 emails that Clinton had sent to an unnamed colleague not in the government (suspected to be her adviser Sid Blumenthal) that had fallen into the hands of foreign powers, including Bangladesh (though funneled through China). 

To who had mysteriously posted these over 300 Hillary Clinton emails to the FBI website prior to their being destroyed by Director Comey, and before President Trump took office, this report details, were FBI agents loyal to US Attorney for the District of Maryland Rod Rosenstein—whom the SVR says was enraged at the Clinton’s for their diabolical decade long scheme with the controversial Indian drug manufacturer called Ranbaxy to sell watered down AIDS drugs to Africa—and who then US Attorney Rosenstein prosecuted and won an astounding $500 million judgment against with his stating: “This is the largest false claims case ever prosecuted in the District of Maryland, and the nation’s largest financial penalty paid by a generic pharmaceutical company”.


“Interesting to note – US Deputy Attorney Rosenstein, was the person whose legal advice was given to President Trump that “Under longstanding protocols between Russia and the United States, all recording devices in rooms where officials meet must have their recording systems declared, either if or not working.”  Taping when Russia is visiting is long standing practice.  Not illegal.