Why Are People Taking A Vaccine? ARE WE HEADING FOR ANOTHER NUREMBERG TRIAL?

If a vaccine will not keep you from getting a virus, and it will not keep you from wearing a mask, social distancing, or free you of inhumane mandates, why are you taking it and ask why are they mandating that you do take it?

It is an odd thing that we are even having to have this conversation for it is common sense that the vax mandate that is killing many, causing others crippling side affects, and not curing anything is of NO MEDICAL value. Forced vaccines or you have no rights or liberties to live your life free, receive an education, be employed, shop for food, travel, attend events…is a crime against humanity.

In fact, the government mandates, along with the medical community pushing this unconstitutional mandate is guilty of violating the Nuremberg Code and subject to lawsuits under crimes against humanity.

The Nuremberg Code

1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
   This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that, before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject, there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person, which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
   The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study, that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
5. No experiment should be conducted, where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the
   experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9. During the course of the experiment, the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end, if he has reached the physical or mental state, where continuation of the experiment seemed to him to be impossible.
10. During the course of the experiment, the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgement required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

(“Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10”, Vol. 2, pp. 181-182. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1949.)

IS THE WORLD HEADED TOWARD A NEW TRIAL ON CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY? IT APPEARS THAT IS THE DIRECTION WE ARE TAKING!

Biderman’s chart of coersion is looking like a guideline of the CDC and WHO. We are all being subject to domestic abuse.

It is time to begin legal action against all responsible parties forcing vaccines onto a population of people who either don’t want them and or a population that is unsuspecting and took it because their doctor told them to do it. Insurance companies do not compensate people who take it and have side affects which include death. It is not FDA approved, nor does it do anything to benefit the health of the person. It is a total experiment on humanity with one of the side affects being death. People have not been informed as to what is in the vaccine, and most who are told the contents do not understand what ingredients do nor which ones are toxic. Most all have been lied to about what is in it and what it will really do to them when they take it.

The media has pushed the vaccine as an answer to lockdowns and sickness in lockstep with Big Pharma and the CDC which is a vaccine company. The CDC is not a government agency like the FDA, it is a private corporation whose main function is developing vaccines. The entire COVID-19 mandates and push for mandatory vaccines and lockdowns has been a crime against humanity on a world scale.

• 

At what point do the people call it what it is and that is human experimentation, with alleged hallmarks of NAZI Germany’s genocidal experimentation.

Wake up and take legal action. It is time for individual and class action lawsuits to end the wrongful death experimentation being pushed on all of humanity.

Stay Strong!

Dianne