DONALD TRUMP AS DARTH 71ff99_c689973d49d4281b04389c9e5c1975f6


It appears there is a Tea Party for patriots who want to make America great again, and another Tea Party who want to endorse a Goldman Sachs, Robert Zoelick candidate to usher in the North American Union.

It is what it is.  The same as there are a group of so-called conservatives who want to usher in a pastor to lead the nation into what?  I guess division?  And another group who were once called conservatives who want to make America great again. I say once called because those that don’t want to usher in the establishment’s darling are no longer called conservative.  They are called evil ones, sinners and foul four letter words on social media for supporting their candidate – who will be, without a doubt, the next president of the United States of America – Donald J. Trump.

Americans do not want North American Made, they want to see Made in America!  They are very informed of Cruz and the establishments plans to usher in a north American union.  They read the Task Force Plans and they know that Heidi and Ted are in bed with the entire lot of them and have been since the Bush campaign in 2000.  Their roots are very deep, and the puppet masters have their strings all over them.

So, the war against saving America versus handing her over to establishment goals, which are North American Union, is now being waged.

So scream and shout all the lies you desire Cruz bots, media, and establishment puppets – that just makes the Trump supporter resolve to save America that much stronger. The force is strong in us!

Dianne Marshall


  1. Please, view the video and read the complete post before you comment.

    What’s a ‘Natural Born Citizen’ and why a U.S. President Must Be One, with KrisAnne Hall

    Reason why Barrack Hussein Obama, II, was not eligible to be President and why Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio are not eligible to run for the Presidency. By Fremont V Brown III

    Barack Hussein Obama II is not a Natural Born Citizen because his Father was born 1936 in the British Colony of Kenya and Protectorate of Kenya (1920-1963), and was thus born a subject of the British Crown. If as it appears, Barack Hussein Obama II was also born in the Colony of Kenya, then he too was born a subject of the British Crown. Even if he were born in Hawaii, he still would not be a natural born citizen, because his Father was not a US Citizen. So he is not eligible to be President of the United States.

    Rafael Eduardo “Ted” Cruz, was born in Calgary, Canada. Cruz’s father became a Canadian citizen during his residence in Canada. Once Cruz’s father returned to the US he renounced his Canadian citizenship.

    But, what is very important is that Ted’s Father became a naturalized US citizen in 2005 long AFTER Ted was born. It is not necessary that a person be born within the US to be a Natural Born Citizen. WHAT is necessary is that his parents must already be Citizens of the U.S. at the time he was born. Vattel understood that US citizens might be abroad in the service of their Country and their child might be born in the foreign land. Since children inherit, as a matter of natural right, the status of their parents, the Child is BORN a US citizen. That is why John McCain is an NBC. His father, already a US citizen, was stationed in the Panama Canal Zone. His Mother, already a US Citizen, was living with her husband. So their son, John, was BORN a Natural Born Citizen.

    Marco Rubio is not a Natural Born Citizen. Neither of his parents were U.S. citizens at the time of Rubio’s birth in 1971. His parents applied for U.S. citizenship and were naturalization in 1975, four years AFTER his birth.

    Location of birth is always irrelevant. All that matters is the citizenship status of the parents. Both parents must be U.S. citizens.

    Constitutional provisions:
    Section 1 of Article Two of the United States Constitution sets forth the eligibility requirements for serving as president of the United States, under clause 5:

    No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

    The Twelfth Amendment states, “No person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.”

    Citizen by Birth or Naturalization is not the Same as a NATURAL BORN Citizen!

    Note: The Constitution can be “voided” ONLY if and when it is replaced by another Constitution. Acts do not trump the Constitution. This means the Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land.

    “The Naturalization Act of 1790 states quite clearly: a child born of a U.S.-born mother anywhere in the world is a U.S. citizen by birth and therefore a natural-born citizen,” Rafael Cruz said. – Washington Post, James Hohmann, August 31

    Here is the wording of the Naturalization Act of 1790 – Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That any Alien being a free white person, who shall have resided within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States for the term of two years, may be admitted to become a citizen thereof on application to any common law Court of record in any one of the States wherein he shall have resided for the term of one year at least, and making proof to the satisfaction of such Court that he is a person of good character, and taking the oath or affirmation prescribed by law to support the Constitution of the United States, which Oath or Affirmation such Court shall administer, and the Clerk of such Court shall record such Application, and the proceedings thereon; and thereupon such person shall be considered as a Citizen of the United States. And the children of such person so naturalized, dwelling within the United States, being under the age of twenty one years at the time of such naturalization, shall also be considered as citizens of the United States. And the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens: Provided, that the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States: Provided also, that no person heretofore proscribed by any States, shall be admitted a citizen as aforesaid, except by an Act of the Legislature of the State in which such person was proscribed.

    U.S. Supreme Court, Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1874)

    “The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.” Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162, 168.

    Note: The use of the word “CITIZENS” meaning both parents, not just one parent in the Naturalization Act of 1790 and U.S. Supreme Court, Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1874) in order to be a natural born citizen.

    Do you think that the reason that LIBERAL Academians that claim Ted Cruz is a Natural Born Citizen do not wish the public to be reminded that Obama’s birth parallels Cruz’s – that is only one parent was a U.S. Citizen? And He, Obama like Cruz is not a Natural Born Citizen.

    For more on Natural Born Citizen


    If it’s important to anyone that we get back to following the US Constitution after Obama’s shredding of it, this is a critical issue. Our Constitution requires that our President and Vice President be Natural Born citizens; not just citizens, not “naturalized” citizens and not “citizens at birth.” Cruz knows the difference but voters don’t so the ruse is on. Obama got away with it so why not Cruz. Below is the perfect example of why our founders demanded Natural Born status for these two elected offices – loyalty to the nation you represent, not some foreign country. Is Obama loyal to the US? Lesson learned!

    Is this guy eligible to be President? Like Ted Cruz, his mother is a US citizen! So, to quote Cruz: “My mother is a citizen therefore I am a citizen at birth and a natural born citizen.” With the Cruz definition, so is Prince Hamzan of Jordan. – – Jeanene Van Zandt

    Fordham Law Prof: Ted Cruz Not ‘Natural Born’ Under ‘Originalist’ View of Constitution

    Ted Cruz is not eligible to be president

    Subversion in the U.S.A.
    By Fremont V Brown III

    There is a movement of subversion in this country using so-called constitutional lawyers, constitutional conservative radio and talk show hosts and major media outlets to re-educate the American public. Subversion refers to an attempt to transform the established social order and its structures of power, authority, and hierarchy.

    Its time to find some OLD History and Civics textbooks and learn the truth. Get out there and do your own research. Do not take their word for it.

    One good example is the so called Constitutionalists pushing an Article 5 convention which will destroy the Constitution. To understand why visit: Constitutional Conventions/Article V Convention/Nullification

    Another good example is the so called Constitutionalists and their desired Candidates trying to change the 200 year old definition, taught in schools when I was a student, of Natural Born Citizen to one that not only gave us Obama and, if they can get everyone to believe them will destroy the reason and safeguard of electing a candidate LOYAL only to the United States of America. To learn the true definition of Natural Born Citizen and why a candidate for President must be one visit: U.S. Citizen.

    Then there are the ones that wish to destroy the 2nd amendment and take away an American’s tool to defend themselves against a Government of Tyranny and against criminals in self-defense. To learn your 2nd amendment RIGHTS and why the Founders knew we needed them visit: 2nd amendment

    Here are some more examples of Subversion The 1963 Communist Goals to take over America:

    15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.

    16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.

    17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers’ associations. Put the party line in textbooks.

    18. Gain control of all student newspapers.

    20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policymaking positions.

    21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.

    26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”

    27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with “social” religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity which does not need a “religious crutch.”

    28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of “separation of church and state.”

    29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.

    30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the “common man.”

    31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the “big picture.

    The above are just a few, keep your eyes, ears and mind open. And always BEWARE when they tell you its for your safety, etc.. Then read and learn the Constitution. The Founders wrote the Constitution to limit and define the powers of YOUR government.


  2. Frank O'Pinion says:

    Article I, Section 2 of the Constitution requires, among other things, that members of Congress be “Citizens” for at least seven years for Representatives and at least nine years for Senators. Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 requires that persons to be eligible to be President be “Citizens” of the United States by the time of the adoption of the Constitution, and if not a Citizen of the United States by then, be a “natural born Citizens” of the United States. Hence, Article II excludes from presidential eligibility all those who were, are, or are to be citizens of the United States after the adoption of the Constitution, unless they could, can, or will be able to demonstrate that they are natural born citizens. 

    James Madison made that statement in 1789 within the context of the Congressional debate between David Ramsay and William Smith which involved the question of whether William Smith was a citizen of the United States for the minimum of seven years which status was required for him to be eligible for the House of Representatives. Smith was born before July 4, 1776. Hence, Madison was referring to whether William Smith was an original “citizen” of the United States for seven years so that he could be eligible for the House of Representatives. Original citizens, who were at first a citizen of one of the thirteen states and then became citizens of the whole United States upon ratification of the Constitution, being born in the colonies or some foreign nation to British or other alien parents, could not be natural born citizens. We know that as applied to citizens of the United States that followed the original citizens of the United States, Madison, as is evidenced by the Naturalization Act of 1790 (passed after Madison made that statement) and 1795, maintained that children born in the United States to alien parents were aliens and in need of naturalization after birth. Through these Acts, Madison and Congress, which was made up of many Founders and Framers, also communicated that children born out of the United States, even to U.S. citizen parents, needed to be naturalized to be citizens of the United States. The treatment of jus sanguinis (right from blood) and jus soli (right from soil) in this manner was consistent with the American national common law definition of a natural born citizen which was a child born in a country to parents who were its citizens at the time of the child’s birth. Hence, if a person was missing either place of birth or birth to citizen parents, Congress saw that person as in need of naturalization which is what it offered in the Naturalization Acts of 1790, 1795, 1802, 1804, and 1855. In these acts, Congress was willing to adopt a person as a citizen of the United States at birth, provided that the person was born to two U.S. citizen parents, later at least to a U.S. citizen father, and today to either a citizen father or citizen mother. 

    Cruz was born in Canada in 1970, presumably to a U.S. citizen mother and to a non-U.S. citizen father. Congress, through the Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1952, adopted Cruz as a citizen of the United States at birth through that naturalization Act. He is a “citizen” of the United States at birth, but not a “natural born citizen” of the United States at birth. Being neither “a natural born Citizen, [n]or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution,” Cruz is not eligible to the Office of President. Article II, Section 1, Clause 5. 

    Credit: Mario Apuzzo, Esq. 


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s