If You Like Obama, You Can Keep Him.


If you liked Obama you can keep him, just vote for Cruz.  They have a lot in common.

*Both went to Harvard

*Both were constitutional law experts (supposedly)

*Both have yet to prove their eligibility to run for office (14th Amendment issue)

*Both avoid using their real names- Rafael Eduardo Cruz goes by Ted (never Rafael) …   Barack Hussein Obama went by Barry, now Obama (never Hussein).

*Both guard their records (giving out only what they want you to see)

*Both proud of the foreign countries they lived in – Ted, Canada …Obama, Indonesia.

*Both had birth fathers from countries they didn’t grow up in (Ted’s father, Cuba) … (Obama’s father, Kenya)

*Both avoid answering national born questions, they laugh it off or say that’s absurd or a conspiracy.

*Both are supposedly good speech givers (depending on whether you like Shakespeare (Cruz) or teleprompter (Obama).

*Both have two daughters

*Both stutter when caught being deceptive

*Both families worked in oil industry   (Obama’s gramps and Cruz’s father and mother)

*Both have radical religious influences (Cruz, Seven Mountains Dominionism – Obama, Black Theology Church)

*Both are advised by Council on Foreign Relations, Bilderberg members and Kissinger.

*Both have been noted for saying one thing and doing another.

*Both love America and want to unite her.

9 thoughts on “If You Like Obama, You Can Keep Him.

  1. Frank O'Pinion says:

    The presidential qualifications are not determined in the 14th Amendment.

    Read Atty Mario Apuzzo’s writing to learn the true “originalist” understanding of “natural born Citizen” and WHY they chose that term … to insure “sole allegiance and unity of citizenship” at birth for future presidents and commander in chief of our military. Article II “natural born Citizen” expert and attorney Mario Apuzzo’s “tour de force” on “natural born Citizen” in U.S. common law and to constitutional standards. Congress can NATURALIZE anyone at birth or later in life by statute. But the CANNOT create a “natural born Citizen”. Only the Law of Nature and Nature’s God can do that. Read Atty Apuzzo’s most recent essay on “natural born Citizen”. One of many over the last 7+ years: http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2015/11/a-citizen-is-on

    Read more at http://www.birtherreport.com/2016/01/iowa-governor-terry-branstad-canadian.html#hMRm0DvQyQCJPOf4.99


  2. Frank O'Pinion says:

    From the article:
    “*Both have yet to prove their eligibility to run for office (14th Amendment issue)”

    The 14th Amendment is not the litmus test to determine eligibility for the office of the POTUS.


  3. rtm9999 says:

    The 14th Amendment was ratified to provide a Constitutional Amendment to enforce legislation that had already been passed and sign into law. The 1866 Civil Rights Act had already naturalized the freed slaves as US citizens however the Jim Crow laws and Dred Scott decision were being used to undermine the effectiveness of the 1866 Civil Rights Act. So the 14th amendment made all Jim Crow laws un Constitutional when challenged in court. Just like the Emancipation Proclamation had freed the Slaves during the Civil War. .The 13th Amendment was ratified to guarantee that all forms of slavery were un Constitutional.
    So while it is great that the 14th became an amendment to the Constitution. There is a misapplication of what is required to become a US citizen regardless of where the person was born. The 1866 Civil Rights Act had already declared that everyone born in the country might under specific conditions could become citizens the requirement was that the child must be born to parents that did not owe allegiance to any foreign power were declared to be citizens. Otherwise obviously any person owing allegiance to a foreign power must be naturalized. So “subject to the jurisdiction” actually meant that the person needed to be completely subject to the jurisdiction and not just temporarily subject to some laws while they were in the country.

    An Act to protect all Persons in the United States in their Civil Rights, and furnish the Means of their Vindication.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States; and such citizens, of every race and color, without regard to any previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall have the same right, in every State and Territory in the United States, to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold, and convey real and personal property, and to full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of person and property, as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, and penalties, and to none other, any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, to the contrary notwithstanding……… ”

    So birth in country to a foreigner or foreigners or an alien or aliens was never the intent of “subject to the jurisdiction”.

    And as far as US vs WKA citing English Common Law?
    The English merely naturalized certain children of certain aliens.
    So jus soli is a form of naturalization that carried with it certain conditions that must be met before the child of an alien could become an English subject so there was never any precedent in English common law for what Gray ruled concerning WKA.

    § 214. Naturalization.(58)
    A nation, or the sovereign who represents it, may grant to a foreigner the quality of citizen, by admitting him into the body of the political society. This is called naturalization. There are some states in which the sovereign cannot grant to a foreigner all the rights of citizens, — for example, that of holding public offices — and where, consequently, he has the power of granting only an imperfect naturalization. It is here a regulation of the fundamental law, which limits the power of the prince. In other states, as in England and Poland, the prince cannot naturalize a single person, without the concurrence of the nation, represented by its deputies.

    Finally, there are states, as, for instance, England, where the single circumstance of being born in the country naturalizes the children of a foreigner. – Vattel / Law of Nations

    “Mere birth in country had already been ruled out as a means of becoming a US citizen in Elk vs Wilkins.

    The petition, while it does not show of what Indian tribe the plaintiff was a member, yet, by the allegations that he “is

    Page 112 U. S. 99

    an Indian, and was born within the United States,” and that “he had severed his tribal relations to the Indian tribes,” clearly implies that he was born a member of one of the Indian tribes within the limits of the United States which still exists and is recognized as a tribe by the government of the United States. Though the plaintiff alleges that he “had fully and completely surrendered himself to the jurisdiction of the United States,” he does not allege that the United States accepted his surrender, or that he has ever been naturalized, or taxed, or in any way recognized or treated as a citizen by the state or by the United States. Nor is it contended by his counsel that there is any statute or treaty that makes him a citizen.
    The question, then, is whether an Indian, born a member of one of the Indian tribes within the United States, is, merely by reason of his birth within the United States and of his afterwards voluntarily separating himself from his tribe and taking up his residence among white citizens, a citizen of the United States within the meaning of the first section of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution.
    The Indian tribes, being within the territorial limits of the United States, were not, strictly speaking, foreign states, but they were alien nations, distinct political communities,
    The members of those tribes owed immediate allegiance to their several tribes, and were not part of the people of the United States.
    This section contemplates two sources of citizenship, and two sources only: birth and naturalization. The persons declared Page 112 U. S. 102 to be citizens are “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” The evident meaning of these last words is not merely subject in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely subject to their political jurisdiction and owing them direct and immediate allegiance. And the words relate to the time of birth in the one case, as they do to the time of naturalization in the other. Persons not thus subject to the jurisdiction of the United States at the time of birth cannot become so afterwards except by being naturalized, either individually, as by proceedings under the naturalization acts, or collectively, as by the force of a treaty by which foreign territory is acquired.”


  4. Intentional Healing says:

    Congress will not act so we have to! Copy this letter and email and/or snail mail it to your representative.

    Petitions are not getting the job done and neither are our leaders. But, maybe when they know, that we know, that they are committing treason by allowing Obama to commit treason, they will act!

    This is a letter for our/your state representative. Having knowledge of treasonous acts by our POTUS and not acting on them by impeaching Obama is also an act of treason. Our congressmen and women are legally bound to act. If they do not act, they are also committing treason. They must act. We need to send a letter to our representative now. We need to impeach Obama before he destroys us. Please, feel free to use my letter, below. I am still working on it and will publish my completed letter soon. ~ Beth

    Dear Representative _________________

    I am an American citizen and I am aware of the treasonous acts made by our United States President Barack Hussein Obama. I am also aware that it is your legal obligation to impeach and/or arrest the president for these treasonous acts.
    Sir or Mam, I am aware of Code 2382 and that you will also be legally bound to act in response to these treasonous and traitorous acts of the president. In fact, if you do not act you will be committing treason yourself.

    The question that we, the people of the United States of America, are asking you, our servants, is are you aware of treasonous acts by our President, Barack Hussein Obama? Do you know whether or not Barack Obama is or has been, Aiding The Enemy, ISIS and/or the Muslim Brotherhood? If yes, this is TREASON, and if you know and fail to act on this information, you are guilty of Misprision of Treason, and we the people will know.

    Please, remember your oath to preserve and defend the Constitution of the United States of America. And, please, remember your children and grandchildren will inherit what you do, have done or fail to do
    Please, know that I am extremely serious about pursuing this matter and I expect you to act in accordance with our laws.
    Respectfully yours,

    Misprision of Treason
    My state representative, Congress, and the Joint Chiefs of Staff
    be advised of Misprision of Treason.
    18 U.S. Code § 2382 – Misprision of Treason
    Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Thank you for another informative site. Where else could I get that type of information written in such an ideal way? I have a project that I am just now working on, and I’ve been on the look out for such info.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s