The Constitution Is Not Left To Private Interpretation

Constitution%20Founders%20Understood

It’s not about Cruz, Rubio or Obama.  It is about an attack on the United States Constitution.  To allow the blatant ignoring of the statutes that specifically spell out the proper code of law to be followed, the code that is used as the base for all other law to follow…is a direct attack on the law of the land itself.

We must never allow candidates, nor any individual to usurp the constitution and the legal requirements to run for the office of the president, any more than we should allow any to usurp the first  amendment of freedom that assures us that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people to peaceably assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Nor the second amendment that insures us a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Anyone who will hold to their fifth amendment right that no person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in time of War or public danger, nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation, is either hiding a truth or threatened in some manner.
Now if we hold these dearly, we must also hold dearly the other amendments, especially the fourteenth amendment that lays out the requirements of natural born and naturalized citizenship and the requirements to hold the office of the president. These requirements are clearly set forth, but those with differing opinions as to the interpretation thereof seem to be as many as those who have formed their own interpretation of Biblical scripture; therefore it is imperative that this matter be resolved by Judicial clarity, clearly following the precise wording and guidelines set forth by our founding fathers who clarified the meaning for this very purpose, and to include the founding fathers discussions and written clarifications of intent and written resources used when finalizing these particular requirements.
Dianne Marshall

 

5 thoughts on “The Constitution Is Not Left To Private Interpretation

  1. Frank O'Pinion says:

    From the article:
    “Now if we hold these dearly, we must also hold dearly the other amendments, especially the fourteenth amendment that lays out the requirements of natural born and naturalized citizenship and the requirements to hold the office of the president.”

    Author: What part of the 14th Amendment “lays out the requirements of natural born and naturalized citizenship and the requirements to hold the office of the president?

    You lost me. I thought the 14th Amendment assigned ‘citizenship’ to those who were enslaved through the following text:
    “Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

    Of course, there are other parts to the 14th Amendment, but nothing to do with natural born citizenship or president.

    Like

  2. phil fan says:

    Here’s an idea = Let’s get Donald in as Prez and appoint some new/replacement justices to SCOTUS and THEN do a little clarifying of these questions about NBC and naturalized citizens. But I don’t trust Cruz on the SC ar all.

    Like

  3. The Constitution; meant nothing to hussein. For us, not to pay attention to that type of abuse, also means, a lack of interest in our part, we must make sure the rules are followed through.!

    Like

  4. I was extremely pleased to find this website. I wanted to thanks for your time for this fantastic read!! I certainly enjoying each small bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you weblog post.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s